14 Tothill Street

Caroline Spelman: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission for how many months the offices at 14 Tothill Street have been empty; for what reasons the offices have been empty; and what the cost of  (a) rent and  (b) business rates during this period has been.

Nick Harvey: The building was acquired following a property search to meet a need from the House of Lords for decant space to facilitate the development of the Millbank Island site and a requirement for additional space from the House of Commons. The property search had revealed a dearth of suitable accommodation at that time within an acceptable distance of the Palace of Westminster, 14 Tothill street being the only one available with sufficient space that met the criteria.
	The lease commenced in October 2007. It is held by the House of Commons with a memorandum of understanding to cover the House of Lords' use of part of the building and the facilities.
	When acquired it had been refurbished by the landlord ready for fitting out, including services, by the tenant. The initial 12 months were rent-free, reflecting the sort of period that would be needed for any tenant to bring the building into beneficial use. Work on the floors to be occupied by the House of Lords is timed to be completed for the return of the House from the summer adjournment and the move of the Law Lords to the new Supreme Court building. A decision will be taken this month on the occupation of the House of Commons' space. The decision will be based on the need to free up 1 Derby Gate for occupation by Members as recommended by the Administration Committee.
	The Commons share of the total rent paid to date, including the current quarter, is £2.38 million (including VAT). Business rates are not due until the property is occupied.

Departmental Surveys

Grant Shapps: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission how much the House of Commons Commission spent on staff surveys in each of the last five years; and which companies were contracted to carry out the surveys.

Nick Harvey: The following amounts have been spent on staff surveys in recent years:
	
		
			   £000 
			 2005-06 39 
			 2006-07 44 
			 2007-08 34 
			 2008-09 (o date) 51 
		
	
	Detailed figures for earlier years are no longer held, in line with the House's data retention policies. The contracted work has been undertaken by Towers Perrin; Whitmuir Management Consultants and Empathica.

Parliamentary Education Unit

David Amess: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what materials are produced by the Parliamentary Education Service for  (a) schools and  (b) individual pupils; what publications are planned during the next year; and if he will make a statement.

Nick Harvey: The Education Service produces a range of materials about Parliament, the work of Members (of both Houses), and political literacy generally. All resources are provided free to schools. While many of the materials are suitable for use by individual pupils, they are primarily used in the classroom. One publication targeted at pupils directly is the young person's guide entitled "The Houses of Parliament", which is distributed to all school-aged visitors taking a tour of Parliament.
	Teaching resources currently in print include a range of different booklets targeted at pupils from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 5 (covering ages seven to 18). There is also a set of four films on DVD, including the award-winning "Democracy? You Decide" and "You've Got the Power". The latter has just been updated and is available with a teacher's booklet for three age groups. It is also being made available on Parliament's You Tube channel
	www.youtube.com/UKParliament
	The Education Service relaunched its website
	www.parliament.uk/education
	in October 2008. This provides a variety of resources which can be used online and also downloaded, including all the printed publications together with information pages, lesson plans, films, virtual tours of Parliament, games and activities, and podcasts. Users can also subscribe to a monthly electronic newsletter. The Education Service will provide materials on request to Members to support their work with schools.
	Plans for the next financial year include the provision of a new set of printed publications to replace and consolidate the existing booklets which have been in use for a number of years. The new publications are being designed to support more directly the citizenship and politics curricula. New content is also being commissioned for the website, including interactive games. There are also plans to replace the films and other content following the next general election.

Council Housing: Greater London

Paul Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 24 February 2009,  Official Report, columns 540-1W, on council housing: Greater London, when she expects the new analytical model to be in use by her Department; and if she will make a statement.

Iain Wright: We expect the housing need analytical model to be in use within Communities and Local Government by autumn 2009.

Council Tax: Rents

Paddy Tipping: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the average council tax bill per resident issued by each county council in England was in 2008-09.

John Healey: County councils do not issue council tax bills themselves. They do, however levy a precept on lower tier authorities who then collect the council tax on their behalf.
	Details of the county council's own average council tax requirement (in £) per resident of each county council in England for 2008-09 are shown in the following table. These do not include the council tax requirement of the lower tier authorities or any other authorities that precept on the lower tier authorities.
	
		
			  County  Average council tax requirement  (£) 
			 Bedfordshire 408.12 
			 Buckinghamshire 435.36 
			 Cambridgeshire 349.88 
			 Cheshire 397.45 
			 Cornwall (1)368.82 
			 Cumbria (1)394.73 
			 Derbyshire 345.17 
			 Devon 403.75 
			 Dorset 460.72 
			 Durham 311.27 
			 East Sussex 438.13 
			 Essex 397.63 
			 Gloucestershire (1)388.31 
			 Hampshire 389.31 
			 Hertfordshire (1)446.90 
			 Kent 384.89 
			 Lancashire 351.94 
			 Leicestershire 345.40 
			 Lincolnshire (1)338.97 
			 Norfolk (1)378.48 
			 North Yorkshire 380.68 
			 Northamptonshire (1)322.44 
			 Northumberland (1)390.45 
			 Nottinghamshire 378.70 
			 Oxfordshire (1)411.55 
			 Shropshire 374.89 
			 Somerset 368.57 
			 Staffordshire 338.62 
			 Suffolk (1)379.23 
			 Surrey 471.90 
			 Warwickshire 408.53 
			 West Sussex (1)456.57 
			 Wiltshire 396.47 
			 Worcestershire 366.70 
			 (1) Counties responsible for funding the fire service for their county area; in the remaining counties the fire service is the responsibility of a separate authority and is funded by a separate council tax precept that is not included in these figures. 
		
	
	The data are calculated from the council tax requirement as stated on the authorities' Budget Requirement form for 2008-09 submitted to Communities and Local Government divided by the mid-2007 population estimates.

Education: Hertfordshire

Michael Penning: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many people  (a) were in full-time education and  (b) retired from employment in (i) Hemel Hempstead and (ii) Hertfordshire in each year since 1997.

Kevin Brennan: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
	 Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated March 2009:
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your parliamentary question asking how many people were in  (a) full-time education and  (b) retired from employment in (i) Hemel Hempstead and (ii) Hertfordshire, in each year since 1997.
	The Office for National Statistics (ONS) compiles employment statistics for local areas from the Annual Population Survey (APS) and its predecessor the annual Labour Force Survey (LFS) following International Labour Organisation (ILO) definitions. Estimates are provided for the number of working age people (Female 16-59, Male 16-64) who stated they are full-time students. A full time student is defined as being at school, following a sandwich course or full time at university or college. Estimates are also provided for the number of people retired from employment, defined as those who are economically inactive and report their main reason for inactivity as being retired.
	Table 1 shows the number of working age persons in full-time education resident in Hertfordshire in each year since 1997. The estimates from 1997 to 2004 are for the 12 month period ending February each year and taken from the annual LFS. Estimates for 2005 to 2008 are for the 12 month period ending March each year and taken from the APS. Estimates for July 2007 to June 2008 have also been provided, the most recent period for which estimates are available. Estimates are not shown for the Hemel Hempstead parliamentary constituency as they are based on small samples and are considered too unreliable.
	Table 2 shows the number of people who are retired from employment resident in Hertfordshire and the Hemel Hempstead parliamentary constituency in each year since 1998. Estimates are provided for the 12 months ending in February from 1998, the earliest period for which estimates are available, to 2004, from annual LFS, and for the 12 months ending in March from 2005 to 2008, from APS. Estimates for July 2007 to June 2008 have also been provided, the most recent for which figures are available.
	As these estimates are for a subset of the population in small geographical areas, they are based on small sample sizes, and are therefore subject to large margins of uncertainty. A guide to the quality of the estimates is given in Table 1 and Table 2.
	
		
			  Table 1: Number of persons working age( 1)  in full-time education( 2)  in (a) Hertfordshire and (b) Hemel Hempstead in each year since 1997. 
			Thousand 
			  12 months ending  Hertfordshire  Hemel Hempstead 
			 February 1998 42 — 
			 February 1999 48 — 
			 February 2000 50 — 
			 February 2001 43 — 
			 February 2002 43 — 
			 February 2003 44 — 
			 February 2004 43 — 
			 March 2005 42 — 
			 March 2006 42 — 
			 March 2007 47 — 
			 March 2008 48 -- 
			 June 2008(3) **48 ****— 
			 '—' = Figures are disclosive or statistically unreliable. (1) Working age (Females 16 to 59, Males 16 to 64) (2) Coverage applies to all respondents, of working age, who stated they are full-time students. A full time student is defined as being at school, following a sandwich course or full time at university or college. (3) Coefficients of Variation have been calculated for the latest period as an indication of the quality of the estimates. See Guide to Quality below.  Guide to Quality: The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV - for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220  Key Coefficient of Variation (CV) (% Statistical Robustness * 0 [le] CV 5 Estimates are considered precise ** 5 [le] CV 10 Estimates are considered reasonably precise *** 10 [le] CV 20 Estimates are considered acceptable **** CV ≥ 20 Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes  Source: Annual Labour Force Survey and Annual Population Survey 
		
	
	
		
			  Table 2: Number of people who are retired( 1)  from employment in (a) Hertfordshire and (b) Hemel Hempstead in each year since 1997 
			  Thousand 
			  12 months ending  Hertfordshire  Hemel Hempstead 
			 February 1998 — — 
			 February 1999 144 10 
			 February 2000 146 10 
			 February 2001 150 13 
			 February 2002 160 14 
			 February 2003 169 14 
			 February 2004 169 14 
			 March 2005 156 14 
			 March 2006 162 15 
			 March 2007 161 13 
			 March 2008 155 17 
			 June 2008(2) **153 ***18 
			 '—' = Data are not available for the period March 1997 to February 1998 (1) The number of people retired from employment is defined as those who are economically inactive and report their main reason for inactivity as being retired. (2) Coefficients of Variation have been calculated for the latest period as an indication of the quality of the estimates. See Guide to Quality below. Guide to Quality: The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV - for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220  Key Coefficient of Variation (CV) (% Statistical Robustness * 0 [le] CV 5 Estimates are considered precise ** 5 [le] CV 10 Estimates are considered reasonably precise *** 10 [le] CV 20 Estimates are considered acceptable **** CV ≥ 20 Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes  Source: Annual Labour Force Survey and Annual Population Survey

Employment

Frank Field: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many  (a) non-UK born UK nationals and  (b) non-UK born non-UK nationals his Department estimates there are in the working population of Britain; and what proportion of the total working population each category represents.

Kevin Brennan: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.
	 Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated March 2009:
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking how many (a) non-UK born UK nationals and (b) non-UK born non-UK nationals it is estimated there are in the working population of Britain; and what proportion of that working population each category represents.
	The requested information is shown in the attached table.
	The estimates are derived from the Labour Force Survey. As with any sample survey, estimates from the LFS are subject to a margin of uncertainty. This is assessed in a footnote to the table.
	The figures in the table are derived from the LFS microdata which are weighted using the official population estimates published in autumn 2007. Consequently they are not entirely consistent with the figures published in the monthly Labour Market Statistics First Release, or the non-UK born employment figures published every quarter, which are weighted using more up-to-date population estimates. However, in this case the difference is very small. The figures in the table add up to 3,820 thousand non-UK born people in employment, compared with a figure of 3,819 thousand published on 11 February.
	
		
			  Non-UK born people aged 16 and over in employment by nationality, three month period ending December 2008, United Kingdom, not seasonally adjusted 
			  Thousands and per cent 
			   Number( 1)  As a percentage of all people in employment 
			 UK nationals *1,466 5 
			 Non-UK nationals *2,354 8 
			 (1 )Coefficients of Variation have been calculated as an indication of the quality of the estimates, as described below:  Guide to Quality: The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV - for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5 per cent. we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220.  Key Coefficient Statistical robustness  * 0 [le] CV <5 Estimates are considered precise. ** 5 [le] CV <10 Estimates are considered reasonably precise. *** 10 [le] CV < 20 Estimates are considered acceptable. **** CV ≥ 20 Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes.  Note: It should be noted that the above estimates exclude people in most types of communal establishment (e.g. hotels, boarding houses, hostels, mobile home sites etc).  Source:  Labour Force Survey

Private Education

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many independent special schools there were in each local authority area in each year since 1997.

Sarah McCarthy-Fry: The number of independent schools catering wholly, or mainly, for pupils with special educational needs; in each local authority area; in each year since 1997, are shown in the following table:
	
		
			  1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 
			 Barking and Dagenham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 
			 Bamet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 
			 Barnsley 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 
			 Bath and North East Somerset 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Bedfordshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Bexley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Birmingham 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 6 7 7 
			 Blackburn with Darwen 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 
			 Blackpool 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 
			 Bolton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 
			 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Bracknell Forest 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Bradford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 
			 Brent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 
			 Brighton and Hove 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 
			 Bristol City of 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 
			 Bromley 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 
			 Buckinghamshire 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 5 
			 Bury 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 3 
			 Calderdale 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 
			 Cambridgeshire 3 3 4 5 4 5 5 5 6 9 10 11 11 
			 Camden 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 
			 Cheshire 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3  3 5 5 5 
			 City of London 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Comwall 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 
			 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 
			 Croydon 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 7 7 
			 Cumbria 8 3 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 13 13 
			 Darlington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 
			 Derby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Derbyshire 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 7 9 10 10 
			 Devon 5 5 5 5 5 7 8 8 7 9 9 10 11 
			 Doncaster 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 
			 Dorset 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 
			 Dudley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Durham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Ealing 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 
			 East Riding of Yorkshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 3 
			 East Sussex 5 4 4 4 5 6 7 7 6 6 6 8 8 
			 Enfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Essex 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 9 9 
			 Gateshead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Gloucestershire 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 5 
			 Greenwich 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Hackney 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Halton 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 12 12 
			 Hammersmith and Fulham 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 
			 Hampshire 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 
			 Haringey 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 
			 Harrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Hartlepool 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 
			 Havering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Herefordshire 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 
			 Hertfordshire 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 
			 Hillingdon 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Hounslow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Isle of Wight 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Isles Of Scilly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Islington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Kensington and Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 
			 Kent 10 11 14 15 17 17 18 19 21 30 32 37 37 
			 Kingston upon Hull City of 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
			 Kingston upon Thames 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Kirklees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 
			 Knowsley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Lambeth 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Lancashire 8 9 9 10 13 13 13 15 21 24 26 30 30 
			 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Leicestershire 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 6 8 8 
			 Lewisham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Lincolnshire 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 4 
			 Liverpool 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 
			 Luton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Manchester 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 
			 Medway 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 
			 Merton 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
			 Middlesbrough 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Milton Keynes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Newcastle upon Tyne 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Newham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 
			 Norfolk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 6 6 7 7 
			 North East Lincolnshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 
			 North Lincolnshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 
			 North Somerset 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 North Tyneside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 
			 North Yorkshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 
			 Northamptonshire 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 
			 Northumberland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 
			 Nottingham 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Nottinghamshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 7 7 7 
			 Oldham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 § 0 1 1 1 1 
			 Oxfordshire 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 
			 Peterborough 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 
			 Plymouth 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Poole 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Portsmouth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Redbridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Redcar and Cleveland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Richmond upon Thames 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Rochdale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 19 19 24 24 
			 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 
			 Salford 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Sandwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 
			 Sefton 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 
			 Sheffield 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Shropshire 4 3 4 5 6 7 7 7 9 15 15 15 15 
			 Slough 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Solihull 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 
			 Somerset 6 6 9 9 12 11 11 11 12 14 15 17 17 
			 South Gloucestershire 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 South Tyneside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Southampton 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 
			 Southend-on-Sea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 
			 Southwark 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 St. Helens 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Staffordshire 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 8 8 
			 Stockport 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
			 Stockton-on-Tees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Stoke-on-Trent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Suffolk 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 7 8 8 
			 Sunderland 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Surrey 6 6 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 9 10 10 
			 Sutton 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 
			 Swindon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Tameside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Telford and Wrekin 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 
			 Thurrock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Torbay 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 Tower Hamlets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Trafford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Wakefield 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 
			 Walsall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Waltham Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Wandsworth 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 
			 Warrington 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 7 9 9 
			 Warwickshire 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 
			 West Berkshire 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 West Sussex 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 10 14 15 17 17 
			 Westminster 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 
			 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Wiltshire 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 e 5 6 6 6 
			 Windsor and Maidenhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Wirral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Wokingham 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 0 0 0 
			 Wolverhampton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Worcestershire 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 
			 York 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			  Source: EduBase.